Pricing/Plan comparison

Plan comparison

Compare SIRJ plans by the operating problem each one solves.

Compare Starter, Growth, Scale, and Enterprise by client workspace volume, reporting cadence, integration coverage, onboarding depth, connector QA, and governance needs.

Start Growth plan See full pricing

Fast answers

Start with the operating boundary.

The right plan is determined by workspace volume, reporting cadence, source readiness, proof depth, and governance.

Plan answer

Which SIRJ plan should most agencies choose?

Most agencies should start with Growth because it includes every current SIRJ integration, up to 20 active client workspaces, custom metrics, client-ready weekly insights, priority onboarding, and the reporting depth needed once ROI proof is already a weekly deliverable.

Growth is the recommended starting plan when the agency already spends meaningful time on recurring client reporting and needs the full source stack without Enterprise procurement.

Review supporting page

Plan answer

When is Starter the right plan?

Starter is right when a smaller team needs the first source-backed reporting motion for up to 5 client workspaces. It should still feel like a complete paid workspace: core integrations, dashboards, Ask Data, white-label exports, and guided setup are included.

Starter is not a stripped-down free tier; it is the clean entry point for proving invoice-backed reporting before recurring agency operations justify Growth.

Review supporting page

Plan answer

When should a buyer choose Scale?

Scale makes sense when client volume, portfolio reviews, lineage exports, connector QA, dashboard templates, and reporting architecture review become recurring operations. It adds operational support around the source layer rather than only raising a workspace limit.

Scale is the plan for teams that need portfolio reporting to stay repeatable across more clients, more connectors, and more review cycles.

Review supporting page

Plan answer

When does Enterprise become the clean answer?

Enterprise is the right path when SSO, procurement, security review, custom retention, private connector rollout, implementation planning, or executive reporting has to be settled before client revenue data is connected.

Enterprise should be selected when governance decides the rollout, not when the buyer only needs more dashboards or ordinary weekly reporting.

Review supporting page

Plan fit

What each plan is meant to solve.

SIRJ plans are separated by the reporting system a team is trying to operate, not by vague feature packaging.

Plan	Best for	Choose when	Upgrade trigger
Starter	Solo operators or small agencies proving the first source-backed reports for up to 5 client workspaces.	Choose Starter when the first proof point matters more than portfolio operations and the team needs core connectors, dashboards, Ask Data, exports, and guided setup.	Move to Growth when weekly reporting needs every current integration or more than 5 client workspaces.
Growth	Agencies running weekly reporting across up to 20 active client workspaces, where source-backed proof is already a recurring deliverable.	Choose Growth when reporting labor is already expensive, recurring, and tied to several client accounts that need the full current source stack.	Move to Scale when connector QA, portfolio reviews, lineage exports, or template standardization become recurring operating needs.
Scale	High-volume agencies, multi-location teams, and portfolio operators that need more repeatability across more clients.	Choose Scale when the source layer needs recurring review, workspace volume is higher, and reports need architecture review instead of one-off cleanup.	Move to Enterprise when rollout is blocked by SSO, procurement, custom retention, private connectors, or implementation governance.
Enterprise	Organizations that need procurement, SSO, custom retention, private connector planning, implementation review, or governed rollout before launch.	Choose Enterprise when security, compliance, private source scope, executive reporting, or implementation planning has to be approved before launch.	Use Enterprise from the beginning when governance is the buying constraint rather than an afterthought.

Decision criteria

Compare the boundaries that actually change.

Use the table when the buyer needs a quick difference between Starter, Growth, Scale, and Enterprise without reading every plan card.

Criterion	Starter	Growth	Scale	Enterprise
Client workspace volume	5 workspaces	20 workspaces	60 workspaces	Custom volume
Integration coverage	Core stack	Every current integration	Every current integration plus QA lane	Private connector roadmap
Reporting cadence	First repeatable reports	Weekly agency reporting	Portfolio review cycles	Governed executive reporting
Source readiness support	Guided setup	Connector health alerts	Dedicated connector QA lane	Private source planning
Proof and export depth	White-label exports	Client-ready weekly insights	Advanced lineage exports	Executive reporting package
Governance	Standard public plan	Public plan with billing portal	Portfolio operations support	SSO, procurement, retention, security review

Upgrade signals

Move plans when the operating need changes.

Upgrades should be tied to visible reporting operations: client volume, recurring cadence, source reviews, or governance requirements.

Starter to Growth

Reporting becomes weekly and client-facing

The work has moved from first proof to recurring client reporting, so full source coverage, weekly insights, and custom metrics become more valuable than a lower starting price.

See proof

Starter to Growth or Growth to Scale

Client workspaces exceed the first cohort

Workspace volume is the clearest plan boundary because it changes reporting cadence, onboarding load, source management, and the amount of client evidence the team has to defend.

See proof

Growth to Scale

Source readiness reviews become recurring

Connector QA and reporting architecture review become useful when source setup, sync history, required fields, and report readiness have to be reviewed across a portfolio.

See proof

Scale to Enterprise

Security or procurement blocks rollout

When SSO, custom retention, security review, private connector scope, or implementation planning decides the purchase, the correct route is a governed rollout rather than a public plan upgrade.

See proof

Value proof

Keep pricing tied to evidence, not discounting.

The comparison reinforces plan value through source coverage, onboarding clarity, annual billing, and operational upgrade paths.

Proof standard

Growth is the common agency starting point

The plan comparison keeps Growth clear for agencies once reporting labor is already recurring across client accounts.Review path

Proof standard

Starter remains a complete paid entry point

The first public plan includes guided setup and source-backed proof, while demos and selected-plan paths handle pre-purchase evaluation.Review path

Proof standard

Annual pricing stays visible

Annual pricing gives agencies a lower effective monthly rate while monthly remains available for teams that need a shorter first commitment.Review path

Proof standard

Upsell paths are tied to real operations

Scale and Enterprise are explained by connector QA, reporting architecture review, private connector planning, procurement, security review, and retention requirements.Review path

Plan questions

Answer plan doubts before checkout.

Is Growth still the recommended SIRJ starting plan?

Yes. Growth is the recommended starting plan for agencies that already run recurring client reporting and need every current integration, weekly insights, custom metrics, and up to 20 active client workspaces.

Should a small team skip Starter?

Not if the team only needs the first source-backed reporting motion for up to 5 client workspaces. Starter is the cleaner entry point when Growth would add operating capacity before the buyer needs it.

Is Scale only about more workspaces?

No. Scale adds operational depth: connector QA, lineage exports, reporting architecture review, templates, and more repeatable portfolio reporting.

Can a buyer change plans later?

Public plans are designed around visible operating boundaries: workspace volume, reporting cadence, source readiness, and governance. Billing and plan-limit pages explain the plan and portal behavior before signup.

Choose the starting plan

Start with Growth unless Starter, Scale, or Enterprise has a visible boundary.

Growth is the common agency starting point. Starter fits first proof, Scale fits portfolio operations, and Enterprise fits governed rollout.

Start Growth plan See full pricing

Which SIRJ plan should most agencies choose?

Growth is the recommended starting plan when the agency already spends meaningful time on recurring client reporting and needs the full source stack without Enterprise procurement.

Review supporting page

When is Starter the right plan?

Starter is not a stripped-down free tier; it is the clean entry point for proving invoice-backed reporting before recurring agency operations justify Growth.

Review supporting page

When should a buyer choose Scale?

Scale is the plan for teams that need portfolio reporting to stay repeatable across more clients, more connectors, and more review cycles.

Review supporting page

When does Enterprise become the clean answer?

Enterprise should be selected when governance decides the rollout, not when the buyer only needs more dashboards or ordinary weekly reporting.

Review supporting page

Plan

Best for

Choose when

Upgrade trigger

Starter

Solo operators or small agencies proving the first source-backed reports for up to 5 client workspaces.

Choose Starter when the first proof point matters more than portfolio operations and the team needs core connectors, dashboards, Ask Data, exports, and guided setup.

Move to Growth when weekly reporting needs every current integration or more than 5 client workspaces.

Growth

Agencies running weekly reporting across up to 20 active client workspaces, where source-backed proof is already a recurring deliverable.

Choose Growth when reporting labor is already expensive, recurring, and tied to several client accounts that need the full current source stack.

Move to Scale when connector QA, portfolio reviews, lineage exports, or template standardization become recurring operating needs.

Scale

High-volume agencies, multi-location teams, and portfolio operators that need more repeatability across more clients.

Choose Scale when the source layer needs recurring review, workspace volume is higher, and reports need architecture review instead of one-off cleanup.

Move to Enterprise when rollout is blocked by SSO, procurement, custom retention, private connectors, or implementation governance.

Enterprise

Organizations that need procurement, SSO, custom retention, private connector planning, implementation review, or governed rollout before launch.

Choose Enterprise when security, compliance, private source scope, executive reporting, or implementation planning has to be approved before launch.

Use Enterprise from the beginning when governance is the buying constraint rather than an afterthought.

Criterion

Starter

Growth

Scale

Enterprise

Client workspace volume

5 workspaces

20 workspaces

60 workspaces

Custom volume

Integration coverage

Core stack

Every current integration

Every current integration plus QA lane

Private connector roadmap

Reporting cadence

First repeatable reports

Weekly agency reporting

Portfolio review cycles

Governed executive reporting

Source readiness support

Guided setup

Connector health alerts

Dedicated connector QA lane

Private source planning

Proof and export depth

White-label exports

Client-ready weekly insights

Advanced lineage exports

Executive reporting package

Governance

Standard public plan

Public plan with billing portal

Portfolio operations support

SSO, procurement, retention, security review

Compare SIRJ plans by the operating problem each one solves.

Start with the operating boundary.

Which SIRJ plan should most agencies choose?

When is Starter the right plan?

When should a buyer choose Scale?

When does Enterprise become the clean answer?

What each plan is meant to solve.

Compare the boundaries that actually change.

Move plans when the operating need changes.

Reporting becomes weekly and client-facing

Client workspaces exceed the first cohort

Source readiness reviews become recurring

Security or procurement blocks rollout

Keep pricing tied to evidence, not discounting.

Growth is the common agency starting point

Starter remains a complete paid entry point

Annual pricing stays visible

Upsell paths are tied to real operations

Answer plan doubts before checkout.

Start with Growth unless Starter, Scale, or Enterprise has a visible boundary.

Preparing the source route.

Compare SIRJ plans by the operating problem each one solves.

Start with the operating boundary.

Which SIRJ plan should most agencies choose?

When is Starter the right plan?

When should a buyer choose Scale?

When does Enterprise become the clean answer?

What each plan is meant to solve.

Compare the boundaries that actually change.

Move plans when the operating need changes.

Reporting becomes weekly and client-facing

Client workspaces exceed the first cohort

Source readiness reviews become recurring

Security or procurement blocks rollout

Keep pricing tied to evidence, not discounting.

Growth is the common agency starting point

Starter remains a complete paid entry point

Annual pricing stays visible

Upsell paths are tied to real operations

Answer plan doubts before checkout.

Start with Growth unless Starter, Scale, or Enterprise has a visible boundary.